JUICE RAP NEWS – Protect the Internet

 

In an age of instant gratification, click bait and news-for-likes content online, conscious and concerned global citizens are looking for innovative and exciting ways to tell difficult stories. In the 1980s, South African hip hop group Prophets of the City started releasing politically conscious tracks opposing the apartheid system and ever since, we’ve been on a downward spiral towards empty songs with useless lyrics and trance inducing rhythms.

But fear not, oh ye’ of boom-bap faith, ye’ followers of conscious hip hop. While you may be getting used to dumbed down lyrics, with artists making a lot of noise and creating new dance moves, but not really saying anything, not all is lost. THE JUICE MEDIA stands out as the shining star of reason in a world polluted with irrelevant and desensitizing material.

Robert Foster and his team explore the most pressing issues facing mankind and lift the veil on deals done behind the curtain, that still have a profound impact on the very fabric of society and our future existence on planet Earth.

The video above is an extract about Internet Neutrality from the JUICE MEDIA Rap News series, one of the best ways I’ve found to spend your data bundles. Browse the full site [here] or check out their other videos on [YouTube].

#Namibia: Democracy Just a Click Away… #Elections

namibia-regions-map

Just over a million people in Nambia will vote for a new president and members of parliament today, in what will be Africa’s first electronic election. About half of the sub-Saharan nation’s 2.3 million people are eligible to vote, of which 20% were born after independence was won from apartheid South Africa in 1990.

The South West African People’s Organisation (Swapo) led Namibia’s liberation struggle and its candidates have retained power since the country gained independence. Today it will face off against the Rally for Democracy and Progress (RDP), led by a disgruntled Swapo member that’s formed his own party, and Democratic Turnhalle Alliance, a grouping of smaller parties, led by 37-year-old McHenry Venaani. Then there’s the Julius Malema spin off, Namibian Economic Freedom Front (NEFF), made up of nationalisation seeking radicals, convinced that the capitalist system has failed and its pseudo military style of leadership is desperately missed. Read more about the candidates and their parties here.

There aren’t many surprises expected in the turn-out or voter participation, but the focus will be on the Electronic Voter Machines, meant to usher in a new era of efficient voting systems and reliable outcomes. Namibia’s low population size and relative stability during previous elections makes it the perfect test case for the new system. The prospect of electronic election roll-outs across the continent may still be a distant dream, though. In South Africa, smaller political parties opposed the introduction, out of fear that the system could be manipulated to rig the outcome.

FILE: An Electronic Voting Machine.
FILE: An Electronic Voting Machine.

Below is a report by Namibia’s Election Watch on the purchase of electronic voting machines, and how it works.

“As Namibia gears up for the 2014 Presidential and National Assembly Elections, the introduction of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) remains a hot topic.

To date, the Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN) has purchased 3,400 Electronic Voting Machines at a cost of N$10 million. The EVMs were sourced from an Indian company by the name of Bharat Electronics, which developed and designed this technology for electoral processes in the world’s largest democracy. The ECN is expected to start a voter education campaign regarding EVMs in the near future. The Commission will also purchase more EVMs ahead of the 2014 elections.

Although various technologies have been used to automate certain processes in electoral systems, as yet no African country has utilised actual electronic voting machines as part of its election.
In the March 2013 election in Kenya, in what was meant to be Africa’s most modern election, biometric systems were introduced to streamline the voter registration process, while electronic tallying was used to speed up the counting and tallying process once votes were cast. Unfortunately, due to operational and technical problems, both systems failed, forcing the electoral management body to resort to a hand count – a process that took five days and threatened to destabilise the entire electoral process.

Importantly, when introducing EVMs, International IDEA notes that it is critical that strong trust in the electoral system exists. The organisation also notes that countries should be clear on their goals and the purpose for using EVMs, and that deliberate efforts are made to ensure timely implementation, training, transparency, and sustainability.
Most significantly, international experience shows that in the run up to introducing EVMs for elections, voter education is critical to ensuring proper use of the systems, but more importantly, to ensure that Namibians (including civil society, all political parties and organisations, and the public at large) fully trust the process in creating a credible, free and fair election.

Pros and cons

Electronic voting presents a number of important benefits – the most obvious being faster results, a reduction in the number of spoilt ballots, reduced costs of running an election, and the reduction/elimination of avenues for potential manipulation. However, electronic voting is not without risks, and several countries have opted to stick to manual voting mechanisms due to operational/technical constraints, or the implications this may have on their legal frameworks.
In Germany, for example, e-voting was declared unconstitutional in 2009. In the Netherlands in 2008 e-voting was suspended after 20 years of use when activists showed that the systems in use could, under certain circumstances, endanger the secrecy of the vote. Between 2005 and 2009, Ireland invested over 60 million euros in an e-voting solution, before deciding that the system was unreliable.
For countries like Brazil, India, Estonia, and the United States that have decided to make use of EVMs, the benefits have outweighed the possible disadvantages of introducing this system, and each country will have different factors to consider in deciding whether or not to go electronic. International IDEA stresses that “Electronic voting is only one option for resolving challenges in the electoral process,” and encourages countries to evaluate alternative solutions in making decisions on what best suits their context. Often times, this means using electronic voting to speed up the process, but having paper trails in case of any contestations.” – http://www.electionwatch.org.na/?q=node/489

Keep your Eye on the Storm #ClimateChange

Looks like South Africa’s storm category listing is about to go up. Another major tornado captured on video this weekend. Terrifying weather patterns!

use this one

This tornado like storm captured on cellphone video between Vryheid and Dundee in KZN, is the 2nd of its kind in less than 10 days.

Below, a distant tornado is making its way through farm land used to grow export product. Unfortunately, it had an adverse effect on the crops. On the highveld, farmers have become accustomed to irregular losses and unpredicted setbacks due to the changing weather. A decade ago, scientists were able to predict the weather changes with relative certainty, though there aren’t any foolproof ways to shelter the crops.

Mpumalanga storm

The weather doesn’t always mean mayhem and destruction though, just one day before the Mpumalanga tornado, these storm clouds brought much needed relief farmers in East London.

EL tornado storm 2    east london tornado storm

It’s not all about the wet weather. Cold fronts in the middle of spring, earthquakes in Orkney and even this sand storm from Bloemfontein through to Johannesburg are all part of the recent irregular weather patterns.

JHB sandtorm 2    JHB sandstorm 1

The change has definitely caught the attention of South Africa’s insurance companies. At the beginning of this year, after one helluva hail storm, a majority of them operating in the country met to analyse and find better ways to predict when damage will occur.

Subsequently, insurance companies have started issuing warnings about pending hailstorms, while others have made it a marketing issue, as if getting a payout is privilege.

Weather scientists, reinsurance experts and an international agricultural insurance specialist met with the South African Insurance Association and the Insurance Institute of South Africa, in Sandton “due to recent extreme weather events that have caused massive damage and that had led to insurance claims of more than R1 billion in the past year,” they said in a joint statement.

The association’s chief executive, Barry Scott, says in 2012 and 2013, the industry experienced a dramatic increase in hail insurance claims in motor and property sectors…[Read more]

Who knows, in  a few years, the weather could be the most interesting and important subject in global social discourse.

#LestWeForget Govan Mbeki’s Testimony at the Rivonia Trial: #ForTheRecord

madiba11072013

It’s been almost a year since our first president Nelson Mandela died. I remember standing on the hill in Qunu overlooking the grave site while SANDF helicopters flew overhead with the country’s flag, as the sound of trumpets echoed into the distance. What a potent moment, still vivid in my memory.

During this moment, I couldn’t help thinking of Madiba’s friends and comrades in struggle. Below you will find transcripts of the testimony of one such friend; Govan Mbeki. A scholar of the ANC and SACP’s underground movement and an integral part of its communication mechanisms. Coincidentally, this is also the person whom I was named after.

Testimony of Govan Mbeki, defendant.

Direct Examination by Braam Fischer:

Fischer: Had you good reason for this [carrying on the ANC illegally after it was banned]?
Mbeki: Yes. The ANC after a number of years, a number of decades, has been the vanguard of the struggle of the African
people for national liberation And it was something that I just couldn’t accept. At the time thousands of people looked up to the ANC to lead them in the struggle against the laws which were threatening practically every right that the African had enjoyed before. As I say, I just could not accept the fact that the government should destroy the ANC. I therefore continued to be a member of the ANC under conditions of illegality….
Fischer: Has the [white supremacist] policy [of the South African government] itself changed, apart from the name?
Mbeki: No. Apart from that, the leopard has not changed its colours at all. The position was very clearly expressed by the late Prime Minister, Mr. JG Strydom, when he said ‘die wit man moet altyd baas wees’ (the white man must always remain the boss).
Fischer: Has any one of the last three Prime Ministers including the present Prime Minister ever met any leading member of the African National Congress?
Mbeki: Not one of them.
Fischer: Talking about methods of protest. Since this government has been in power what has happened to the right of Africans to hold meetings or demonstrations or processions?
Mbeki:  In the reserves (i.e. African occupied rural areas), since the early  5Os meetings have been banned except those that have the approval of the Native Commissioners. In an area like the Transkei, Proclamation 400, which was passed about four years ago to meet the specific situation, has become a permanent feature of the administration. In the urban areas it is virtually impossible to find a place to hold political meetings of Africans chiefs or headmen who do not approve of government policies have either been deposed or banished. I think that since the Nationalist Party came into power in 1948, no less than 133 chiefs have been banished to different areas where their language is not spoken, or where they couldn’t make a living….
Fischer: I think you worked for eight years in Port Elizabeth?
Mbeki: Yes, I worked for eight years in Port Elizabeth and during that time I was never able to live with my family.
Fischer:  Why was that?
Mbeki:  I was not allowed to rent a house because I had not qualified to be permanently resident in Port Elizabeth because I had not worked for one employer continuously for a period of ten years.
Fischer: So you were never able to bring your family to live with you?
Mbeki: For the eight years I was there I was never able to do so.
Fischer: Your case is not unique?
Mbeki: No, it is not unique. Not at all, because lots of other men who live in single men’s barracks lived there without their families.

Cross-examination by Percy Yutar:

Yutar: I think you will also agree that, despite the evil influences of the South African government, we have not got ritual murders in this country.
Mbeki: What would that explain in any case?

Yutar:  Do you know that the South African Medical Research officials, apart from helping the Bantu in this country, have sent some of their serums to help the non-Europeans in other countries? Do you know about that?
Mbeki: I have heard about that.
Yutar:  Do you know that if you present a balance sheet, you should present a true and fair account? Have you, when you fulminated against the South African government and its people, represented the other side—the benefits which the Bantu have in this country?
Mbeki:   What benefits? What benefits have they been given? I am not aware of any benefits the Africans are getting from the South African government.
Yutar:  Not aware at all? And yet millions try to remain here in this country?
Mbeki:  That does not explain it.
Yutar:  You have given your evidence here in a calm quiet voice. To make certain I was listening to the same person, I had your tape played back (the tape of a speech by Mbeki broadcast over the illegal Radio Liberation). You don’t always speak that way do you? You can raise your voice?
Mbeki: If I must raise it, yes.
Yutar:  And you speak a little faster than you have spoken here?
Mbeki: If I must speak a little faster, I do.
Yutar: And not so sanctimoniously as you have tried to speak here?
Mbeki:  That is your opinion.
Yutar:  [Reading from an issue of the newspaper Spark:] ‘Beneath his quiet charm and gentle smile, a ruthless determination to reach his goal—the emancipation of his people.’ Is that a fair description of you?
Mbeki:  I think so.
Yutar:  A ruthless determination. And in some of your speeches you could be ruthless, not so? And in fact you were in speeches which you addressed when you attended meetings throughout the country. Do you deny that?
Mbeki: I spoke the truth and exposed what was the hardship of the Africans. If you call that ruthless—speaking the truth—then I was ruthless.
Yutar: No. I am just trying to convey, not the subject matter, but the way in which you put it across. You were not the gentle, quiet, sanctimonious human being that you are now showing in the witness box.
Mbeki: Well, that would have to be the opinion of whoever was listening to me.
Yutar: Which group [within South Africa’s Communist Party] were you a member?
Mbeki: The Communist Party group.
Yutar: I know. Which group? I am asking you which group?
Mbeki:  The Communist Party group, I say.
Yutar:  But how many groups were there in Port Elizabeth?
Mbeki:  I don’t know. I was only concerned with my group. That is the group I want.
Yutar:  What was its name?
Mbeki:  The Communist Party group has no name. It is not like a football club.
Yutar: And who were the members of your group?
Mbeki: That I am not prepared to say.
Yutar: You are not prepared to tell us? Why not?
Mbeki: Why should I do so? I am not prepared to incriminate anybody….
Yutar: Well, Mbeki, I will put it to you in very brief form. Four charges against you and you have replied to all of them. You have replied ‘yes’ to all of them. Can you tell his Lordship why you have pleaded not guilty to the four counts?
Mbeki:  Yes. I did not plead guilty to the four counts for the simple reason, firstly, that I should come and explain from here under oath some of the reasons that led me to join Umkhonto we Sizwe. And secondly, for the simple reason that to plead guilty would to my mind indicate a sense of moral guilt to it. I do not accept that there is any moral guilt attached to my actions.
Yutar:  Alright, let us forget about moral guilt. Having now admitted, after making some political speeches, that you were on the National High Command, have committed sabotage, that further acts of sabotage had been conspired to be committed, and you furthered the aim of communism, that you and your colleagues solicited money both here and abroad in order to advance these campaigns, do you now plead guilty?
Mbeki:  I am not pleading guilty!
Yutar: No, you don’t. You don’t even admit you are legally guilty?
Mbeki: I have explained my position….

Rest In Peace Mr. Govan Mbeki (9 July 1910 – 30 August 2001)

#BRICS to Cement its Position – #Analysis

[#Reblogged: RT: G5? A BRICS photo-opp]

Admittedly, All of the BRICS partners face daunting tasks at home. Russia’s Vladimir Putin has the EU-US backed sanctions. Brasil’s Dilma Rousseff recently warned that allegations of corruption leveled against the state owned oil company could change the country forever. India’s newly sworn in Prime Minister Narendra Modi, man of the year? Let’s see. China’s Xi Jinping, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and President of the Country. He’s currently battling to crackdown on pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, while he’s diplomatic delegation is accused of smuggling Ivory from Africa. Then there’s our very own president Jacob Zuma. A parliamentary meltdown and tabloid reports about his alleged mistresses are just some of the more recent headaches the man from Nkandla has to deal with.

I found this interesting video discussion that took place on CNN, on whether the BRICS moment is over, following a slowdown in economic growth in emerging markets. At the G20 summit held in Australia last week, the BRICS partners met again to discuss the establishment of a development bank and the position the partners currently find themselves in. Click below…

[#Reblogged: CNN-Virtual-Think-Tank]

World Toilet Day – Who Really Gives a Shit?

A make-shift toilet in SA. This picture originally appeared in the City Press newspaper.
A make-shift toilet in SA. This picture originally appeared in the City Press newspaper.

Earlier this year the Mothutlung township in the North West province of South Africa nearly went up in flames over prolonged water cuts. Though short-lived, the protests brought the importance of access to fresh water into sharp focus for communities around the country. The National Development Plan, (Government’s 30 year plan for eradicating poverty and stimulating economic and employment growth) describes the situation as water-stressed and precarious. Our dependence on water from the Lesotho Highlands Project couldn’t have been illustrated more clearly than President Jacob Zuma’s rush intervention to prevent the mountain kingdom from slipping into political turmoil over the past few weeks.

Water is irrefutably linked to sanitation. Another point of outrage during 2014 has been so-called poo-protests. This term was coined by journalists after residents of the Khayelitsha township in Cape Town started dumping their shit (literally) at the International Airport and on the steps of the provincial legislature. The shit they were dumping had not been removed from so called bucket toilets that are in thousands of homes across the country.

Below you will find three maps illustrating South Africa’s sanitation profiles in each province, using the 2011 SA census data.

bucket toilet map

pit toilet ventilation

flush toilet with pipes

So remember, the next time you plonk your ass down for a release, pull the flush lever and last night’s supper disappears into the unknown, spare a thought for the people who don’t have that basic right, who wake up to the foul smells of broken service delivery promises, and who still think that nobody really gives a shit.

WHAT THE UNITED NATIONS SAYS ABOUT TOILETS

*World Toilet Day is a day to take action. It is a day to raise awareness about all people who do not have access to a toilet – despite the human right to water and sanitation.

It is a day to do something about it.

Of the world’s seven billion people, 2.5 billion people do not have improved sanitation. 1 billion people still defecate in the open. Women and girls risk rape and abuse because they have no toilet that offers privacy.

We cannot accept this situation. Sanitation is a global development priority. This is why the United Nations General Assembly in 2013 designated 19 November as World Toilet Day. This day had previously been marked by international and civil society organizations all over the world but was was not formally recognized as an official UN day until 2013. World Toilet Day is coordinated by UN-Water in collaboration with Governments and relevant stakeholders.* – http://www.unwater.org/worldtoiletday

The Politics of Business: #Analysis by #TerryBell

Labour writer Terry Bell
Labour writer Terry Bell

Terry Bell

The very public scrap between former trade union leaders John Copelyn and Marcel Golding, both now billionaire business people, has raised a crucial question for the labour movement: the role of union investment companies.

Central, in this case, is the SA Clothing and Textile Workers’ Union (Sactwu), two of its former general secretaries and the present incumbent.

Copelyn was the long-serving Sactwu general secretary who went to parliament in 1994 as an ANC MP. He was joined by Golding, former deputy general secretary of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM). But they soon deserted parliament to launch in 1997, an investment company, using union funds.

Sactwu remains the largest single shareholder in Hosken Consolidated Investments (HCI). This company has interests in many areas known for low-paid labour: hotels, casinos, coal mines and transport. And while the Sactwu investment arm has boomed, the clothing and textile industry has lost tens of thousands of jobs. A number of premises that once housed a thriving garment trade are now part of an HCI rental property portfolio.

Copelyn’s successor as Sactwu general secretary, Ebrahim Patel, is now economic development minister in the Zuma government and has been accused of trying to exert influence on the editorial content of free-to-air commercial station, eTV, owned by HCI. Current Sactwu general secretary, Andre Kriel has also been implicated.

And it was not for the first time that Kriel has stepped outside his union role to intervene in commercial matters. In December last year in the wake of the controversial takeover of Independent Newspapers by Sekunjalo Investments, Kriel initially demanded that all queries relating to the takeover and the subsequent sacking of Cape Times editor, Alide Dasnois, be referred to him.

Although Kriel would not confirm it, it is understood that Sactwu’s investment vehicle may have contributed some R200 million toward the Independent purchase. Whatever the details of the case, there is more than a hint here of how unions involved in big business and investment, may blur the lines between the interests of labour and capital.

In our economic system, it is in the interest of employers is to maximise profits while workers want to improve wages and conditions, a cost on profits. This leads to what supporters of the system sometimes refer to as “creative tension”, that is resolved by negotiation.

It is not in the interests of workers to weaken, cripple or destroy a business to which they sell their labour in order to survive. But it is certainly in the interests of capital to undermine the strength of labour and to ensure a regulatory environment that favours employers.But what happens when the representatives of labour, the unions, also become employers, relying on maximised profits in order to ensure higher dividends?

Supporters of this development maintain that the profits then go to benefit union members.

Critics point out that this is at the expense of other workers and amounts to “crumbs from the table of capital”.

It is a contradiction that, at the least, leads to confusion. Yet there is an understandable history of unions and their federations openly supporting — usually after debate and democratic decision-making — political parties and campaigns, both financially and in terms of volunteer labour.

In South Africa’s case, Cosatu, although not all of its affiliates, is part of the governing ANC-led alliance, a lingering legacy of a common battle against the apartheid system. By and large, this qualified as unadulterated rank and file support, at a particular time and for openly debated and supported policies that workers saw might strengthen their position. It is the antithesis of moves to increase the power of capital.

Unions crossing this boundary, brings to mind the opening line of a song from the 1931 miners’ strike in the US state of Kentucky: “Which side are you on?”

[This article originally appeared on The Con Mag]

Click here to go to the site –> Crumbs from Capital’s Table.

#NUMSA Kicked Out of #COSATU – For Now… #ForTheRecord


WATCH: A report on the history of COSATU, packaged by South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC).

At around 1AM on the 8th of November 2014, 33 union leaders in the Congress of South African Trade Unions voted for the expulsion of the federation’s largest affiliate, the National Union of Metalworkers of SA (350 000+ members). 24 union leaders voted against the move.

At around 2:30AM, NUMSA leaders walked out of the meeting where COSATU split, and announced the decision to the world. The expulsion follows debilitating factional battles which has halted the fight for better working conditions.

But, it’s not over. NUMSA could still challenge its expulsion in court, by arguing that COSATU leaders have contravened the federation’s constitution. This is because the metal workers union, along with eight of its allies, have called for a special national congress to be convened to resolve the dispute; this has not been done.

Click here for a presentation made by NUMSA leaders to the COSATU central executive committee as to why the union should not have been kicked out.

#DOOKOOM – Angry Rappers & Paranoid Farmers

dookoom-700x457

I begin from the premise that hip hop is a culture with 5 elements, (Rap, Dance, DJing, Graffiti and Knowledge of Self). These elements are used as a form of expression of feelings, thoughts or injustice.

I had really hoped I wouldn’t have to do this. I quietly prayed every night since the video for Dookoom’s new EP dropped, that the South African academia would not relegate the progression of hip hop from its colonization by the United States bling and pornography culture, to a bunch of whiteys on Western Cape farms feeling scared and nervous.

First we must recognise the multitude of issues faced by the mainly coloured population, raised by Isaac Mutant in “Larney Jou P**s” and we must note who he really is. Isaac Mutant was once part of Prophets of the City; a Cape Flats based rap group with other notable members such as DJ Ready D, that began its opposition to apartheid policies through politically charged lyrics in late 1988.

After a few decades in which Isaac Mutant’s music fell through the cracks of mainstream media, he now re-emerges in a group with UK born producer and owner of Cape Town based record label Pioneer Unit Damian Stephens, known as D-Planet or Human Waste. Stephens has worked with several South African acts, including Gugulethu based crew Driemanskap and the Soweto born underground hip hop veteran Ben Sharpa. Stephens has also facilitated multiple European tours for Cape Town based artists, who despite international appeal, still struggle to get airplay locally.

So what is Isaac Mutant really talking about in the recently released song? He says;

“Look at your founding father’s curriculum vitae/Jan van Riebeck was the fuckin’ Ernie Lastag of his day”

Ernie “Lastag” Solomon was a well-known Cape Flats gangster, whose life story went on to become a movie.

Isaac Mutant goes on to claim that the infamous 26s and 28 gangs were born out of frustration with the colonizers from the Dutch East India Company.

“He did pigallela with depression and hunger/Some brothers rebelled, hence Nongoloza and Mpumalanga/ Up in your quarters you’re calling my people bandits, dammit! Hater taught hate, that’s why we gang bang it/ My family spread over the plantations/ And by the way, who the fuck is you to call my frustrated as racist”

Then there’s the re-mixed nursery rhyme that made rights group Afriforum lay a complaint with the Human Rights Commission;

“Father Abrahams had many farms/ I work on one of them and so do you/ So let’s go burn them down”

 Well, let’s see how the Commission will respond.

Before the frustration and rebellion of farm workers against their employers is attributed to a hip hop song made by a Cape Flats rapper, who really isn’t saying anything he hasn’t said before, we should ask if Dookoom really has the power to spring thousands of mainly uneducated labourers whose favourite genre of music is highly unlikely hip hop, into a rage that would end Western Cape farming. This writer thinks not.

The style of hip hop presented by Dookoom is raw, hard and jaw grinding, but it is not surprising. Pioneer Unit is known to base its videos on the culture of its artists. For Driemanskap’s videos, the artists tell stories of Xhosa cultural practices and norms, wearing their traditional attire. Then for Dookoom, Isaac Mutant tells a story of coloured people’s history and culture, using what is known as Afrikaaps. (Afrikaaps refers to the informal (sometimes vulgar) version the Afrikaans language spoken by coloured people. A collective of Cape Town artists have also toured the EU, playing a live musical in Afrikaaps to Dutch speaking audiences.)

The truth is that it’s not so much the release of Dookoom’s video, but the reaction to it in the public space that represents a very important moment for the country’s young culture. Dookoom is by no means the first rap group to make music and videos questioning the status quo and lack of reform in SA.

Two years ago, Motif Records, owned by world renowned SA rapper Tumi Molekane, sought to dissect what drove South Africa’s men to abuse women, physically and emotionally. The POWA (People Against Woman Abuse) mixtape spoke about President Jacob Zuma’s rape trial and commentary from the likes of Pro and others on the club culture that often sees young women exchange a night of drinking and taking drugs for quick sex. This mixtape, and other similar projects, generate a very mild reaction, if any.

There are countless examples of prominent hip hop artists critically examining the issues of the day, but I suppose the reason Isaac Mutant and the Dookoom crew struck a nerve, is because their video “Larney Jou P**s” is a graphic representation of the future South Africa’s boers have always hoped they will never see. A glimpse of the faces that would rebel against them, torch their crops, kill their relatives and bring forth the Afrikaner apocalypse, a mass exodus into the sea.

This delusion has been created, shaped and enhanced by the boers themselves. One could argue that the reason a rebellion is expected is because the farmers are well aware of the extent to which their workers have been exploited by meager wages and dereliction of living conditions, especially on the Western Cape. They are also well aware of the effect their great grandfathers’ introduction of the dop and food payment system on Western Cape farms has had on the psyche of the farm workers families and children, who are now young uneducated men and women who want more than a hokkie to sleep in and R150 a day.

Now before you start throwing a tantrum about how government is supposed to give farm workers houses, education and restore their dignity, consider this; The South African government generates about 30 percent of the country’s economic growth, while the private sector accounts for the other 70 percent. A large chuck of this 70 percent comes from SA’s export industry. In 2010, 47% of the Western Cape export commodities came from agricultural sector, most of it citrus fruits, destined for countries such as the Netherlands, United States, Britain and Angola. So, should the boers be obliged to build houses and schools for their employees, and improve their general standard of living?

The question really is, are the boers willing to share the land their workers have helped cultivate for over four hundred years. The answer may not be as simple as you think.

The ANC’s deputy Secretary General Jessie Duarte is not convinced. At the ANC in Gauteng’s conference this month, she said;

“As soon as our Land Reform minister announced the 50-50 ownership plan for farm employees who had been working and living on the land for years, the boers starting evicting them off the property.”

Shortly after the announcing the proposal, the Transvaal Agricultural Union called a special executive meeting to discuss it. These are two of the reasons TAU cited for its opposition to land reform.

“Farmers do not owe anyone anything. Farmers did not steal land. If government wants to implement a land reform process, it should be financed by government. The farmers do not need to do this on governments’ behalf and are not willing to do so.

Farmers are unable to finance 50 % of the funding of land reform farms.  Moreover, it is unjust and unfair and farmers are simply unwilling to do so.” It said in a statement

The point is, Dookoom’s song and video is completely justified when considering the facts on which it is based. I then have to ask, are those calling for the song to be banned, trying to censor the truth or is this just another attempt to tell as selected narrative of the South African story.

Either way my larney, jou pudding pie.